🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a flawed assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" agendas pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. However, this argument rests on a serious misreading of the reality. The actual danger facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Economic Divide Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing disparity stems from stronger productivity growth in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely agree it is essentially a two-horse race between the United States and China, with Europe entering at a significant disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic system for funding startups. The EU still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hinder Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once met with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are reasons for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains considerable strengths: skilled workforce, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically boost economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. However, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.