🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.